Evaluating Truth And Validity Exercise Essay Example for Free

Evaluating Truth And Validity Exercise EssayThe argument a mature person is self-directing, so p arnts who make all their chelarens for them are doing their offspring a disservice has allot of validity to it, and in more ways than one is true. A electric shaver whose put forwards or guardians make all of his or her decisions for them, are in a way hindering the child because the child does non have the opportunity to compute for himself. When that child grows up and needs to be able-bodied to make important decisions such as what college to go to, who to marry, or what kind of job to apply for, that child go out more likely than not, not slam how to p bandrly decide establish on the information or facts provided to him or her. For instance if a child grows up and is faced with what college to go to and that child has never had to make any important decision for himself, that child may end up in a college going after a degree course of instruction that is not truly what he or she wants to do with their action based on what his or her parent tell them they should go into.That child has then wasted four to five years of his or her life and has to start all over searching for the proper degree or job where he or she can thrive financially and be happy. there is a minute percent of children who leave behind be able to overcome the mentality of not having to entail on his or her cause and be able to make the important decisions that need to be make, but at what price? How many times will that child have to make the wrong choice and suffer because they were not allowed to think on their own? The constant failure and rejection could possibly make matters worse for the child, and could lead to relinquishing all hope.The argument the parole cant be relevant to forthwiths problems it was written many centuries ago and is change with archaic phrasing is another argument with some validity and non-validity. There are mountain who lead since the reco rd book was written over 2,000 years ago that it does not apply to todays standards, and at that place are heap who say the memorizeings in the discussionare meant for all people to follow as a general guideline. The argument can go either way, but if you look at what the Bible really is, it is a book with stories, such as a history book, slightly people who lived 2,000 confirming years ago and the things they went through. If you were to say because it was written back a long time ago it does not apply to todays standards, would be the same thing as saying because our history books teach about Abraham Lincoln and when he lived in the 1700s, that those stories are irrelevant. The Bible is a book for Christian based people to read, and is intended as a guideline for these people on how to properly live their life.There are many stories in the Bible that may or may not apply to todays standards, such as the Old Testament teachings, but that is not to say the entire Bible is not relevant to todays problems. The Bible teaches not to kill and steal, and if 90 percent of people who are in prison followed these two teachings, they would not be in prison today. The other stories about the people who lived in the Bible days are interesting to some, and not to others, as are almost history books ever written about the history of the world. Does this mean we need to stop teaching our children about the history of the world because the teachings in the history books occurred over three centuries ago? I think it on the dot because the Bible represents a faith based book, and that is why it is so ridiculed.The argument its ridiculous to think that there will be fewer deaths if we ban handguns. Handguns dont kill people people kill people has no validity to it in that an actual handgun itself cannot do anything on its own, it is an nonliving object. A handgun or any other type of gun requires a person to physically pick it up, point, and shoot in order to make it o perate a handgun cannot just blow on its own. When people say that handguns kill people, it is the same as saying that a spoon made another person fat, or a car made another person steal it. These are objects that must have an operator or some sort of life force to operate these nonliving objects.Did handguns assist in the killing of a person is a more proper question to ask. If a person wants another person dead and there is not a handgun around, that person will be creative and come up with another means to kill that person. Take John Wayne Gacy for instance, he did not need the use of a handgun to murder hundreds of young boys, he used rope and scarfsto strangle his victims. There are people who claim without handguns certain crimes would not take place, and that may be possible, but if the person wanting to perform the crime was adamant on doing it and did not have a gun, that person would use alternative measures to finish the crime.